Industries
Workwear. The tender asks you to prove what the garment is made of, and the proof is in an inbox belonging to somebody who left in March.
30 minutes, no deck.
You are selling the specification, not the garment
Ask a workwear brand what makes a jacket compliant and you get the right answer. Ask where the certificate is and you get a pause, then a folder named after the year it arrived, then a supplier contacted for a copy of something they already sent.
What makes it expensive is the substitution. A component is swapped for a good reason and nobody re-opens the claim it was supporting, so the specification and the garment part company in the one place a customer is entitled to check.
The certificate lives on the component
Not in a folder next to it. Change the component and what you are able to claim visibly changes with it, at the moment of the change rather than at the audit.
A repeat order is a repeat, not a rebuild
The article keeps its bill of materials, its measurements and its suppliers across years of re-ordering. A deliberate change is a version, with the old one still readable.
Answering takes an afternoon, not a fortnight
Because the evidence was filed as the work happened, the tender response is a query against the record instead of a hunt through five years of mail.
More industries.
Outdoor & performance
Round four exists because rounds one to three were each read on their own.
See how IndustriesHome & textile
Six styles, nine sizes, eleven colours. The catalogue is small and the matrix is not.
See how IndustriesFootwear
Forty components, a dozen suppliers, and a costing that was true on the morning it was typed.
See howSee it on a real season. A live walk through the product on a worked season, with your own way of working in mind.
- One article end to end: colourways, components, suppliers, costs.
- The board, the tech pack and the BOM on that one style.
- What moving your current season across would take.
30 minutes, no deck.