Use cases

Collaboration. The decisions are all in the thread. The record is where they were supposed to end up, and the factory is working from whichever reached them last.

Book a demo

30 minutes, no deck.

Axel Arigato
Axel Arigato

Filed by the mail client, not against the article

A comment on a fit, an approval, a revised quantity: each of those is a decision, and each gets stored by date and sender rather than against the thing it changed. The record and the truth separate quietly, without anyone doing anything wrong.

What that produces is a tech pack saying one thing, a last email saying another, and a supplier reasonably acting on the more recent of the two.

Suppliers working on the article

Not cc'd about it. External partners see the style itself, scoped to what concerns them, with no licence and no onboarding project in the way.

Next steps with an owner and a date

What has to happen sits on the article rather than in someone's head, which is the difference between a plan and a recollection.

A history that settles arguments

Every change attributable, so a disagreement about what was agreed takes two minutes instead of an afternoon.

See it on a real season. A live walk through the product on a worked season, with your own way of working in mind.

  • One article end to end: colourways, components, suppliers, costs.
  • The board, the tech pack and the BOM on that one style.
  • What moving your current season across would take.

Book a demo

30 minutes, no deck.